Current:Home > ContactTennessee not entitled to Title X funds in abortion rule fight, appeals court rules -Wealth Impact Academy
Tennessee not entitled to Title X funds in abortion rule fight, appeals court rules
View
Date:2025-04-15 23:04:24
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Federal officials do not have to reinstate $7 million in family planning grant funding to the state while a Tennessee lawsuit challenging federal rules regarding abortion counseling remains ongoing, an appeals court ruled this week.
Tennessee lost its bid to force the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to restore its Title X funding while the state challenged the federal Department of Health and Human Services program rules. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in upholding a lower court's ruling, did not agree with Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti's argument that the federal rules infringe on Tennessee's state sovereignty.
In a 2-1 finding, the judicial panel ruled Tennessee cannot use its state laws to "dictate" eligibility requirements for a federal grant.
"And Tennessee was free to voluntarily relinquish the grants for any reason, especially if it determined that the requirements would violate its state laws," the Monday opinion stated. "Instead, Tennessee decided to accept the grant, subject to the 2021 Rule’s counseling and referral requirements."
The Tennessee Attorney General's office has not yet responded to a request for comment.
The federal government last year pulled $7 million in Title X funding, intended for family planning grants for low-income recipients after Tennessee failed to comply with the program requirements to counsel clients on all reproductive health options, including abortion.
Inside the lawsuit
Title X funding cannot be allocated toward an abortion, but the procedure must be presented as a medical option. Tennessee blocked clinics from counseling patients on medical options that aren't legal in the state, which has one of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the country.
In the lawsuit filed in federal court last year, Skrmetti argued HHS rules about Title X requirements flip-flopped in recent years and that the HHS requirement violates Tennesseans' "First Amendment rights not to engage in speech or conduct that facilitates abortions."
After Tennessee lost the funding last year, Gov. Bill Lee proposed a $7 million budget amendment to make up for the lost funds that had previously gone to the state health department. The legislative funding may have hurt Tennessee's case to restore the federal funding as judges pointed to the available money as evidence Tennessee will not be irreparably harmed if HHS isn't forced to restore its funding stream.
Last August, the federal government crafted a workaround and granted Tennessee's lost funds to the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood and Converge, which distributed them to Tennessee organizations. The funds are earmarked for family planning services for low-income residents and directly bypass the state health department, which previously distributed the grants.
Skrmetti filed the lawsuit against the HHS two months later.
Latest federal funding fight
The family planning funding was the second federal funding fight to erupt in 2023.
In January 2023, Tennessee announced it would cut funding for HIV prevention, detection, and treatment programs that are not affiliated with metro health departments, rejecting more than $4 million in federal HIV prevention funds.
Tennessee said it could make up the lost fund with state dollars but advocates decried the move and its potential impact on vulnerable communities as the state remains an HIV-transmission hotspot. The Commercial Appeal, part of the USA TODAY Network, later confirmed Tennessee gave up funding after it tried and failed to cut out Planned Parenthood from the HIV prevention grant program.
veryGood! (1698)
Related
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- This physics professor ran 3,000 miles across America in record time
- Actors back. Pandas gone. WeBankrupt.
- Is the Beatles' 'Now and Then' about Paul McCartney? Is it really the last song?
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Is the Beatles' 'Now and Then' about Paul McCartney? Is it really the last song?
- Grammys 2024 Snubs and Surprises: Barbie, Prince Harry, Miley Cyrus and More
- The Best Fleece-Lined Leggings of 2023 to Wear This Winter, According to Reviewers
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Body of South Dakota native who’s been missing for 30 years identified in Colorado
Ranking
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- ‘Nope’ star Keke Palmer alleges physical abuse by ex-boyfriend Darius Jackson, court documents say
- Colorado star Shedeur Sanders is nation's most-sacked QB. Painkillers may be his best blockers.
- How researchers, farmers and brewers want to safeguard beer against climate change
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- SEC, Big Ten showdowns headline the seven biggest games of Week 11 in college football
- Alo Yoga Early Black Friday Sale Is 30% Off Sitewide & It’s Serving Major Pops of Color
- Kenya doomsday cult leader found guilty of illegal filming, but yet to be charged over mass deaths
Recommendation
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
JAY-Z and Gayle King: Brooklyn's Own prime-time special to feature never-before-seen interview highlights
Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh suspended by Big Ten as part of sign-stealing investigation
Exclusive: Projected 2024 NBA draft top pick Ron Holland on why he went G League route
The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
‘Nope’ star Keke Palmer alleges physical abuse by ex-boyfriend Darius Jackson, court documents say
Is the Beatles' 'Now and Then' about Paul McCartney? Is it really the last song?
Could creativity transform medicine? These artists think so